����TV

Attackers have come a long way since using floppy disks to distribute the in 1989. And while the threat had started to feel a lot more real by 2015, it was still largely seen as a contained risk. Painful, but manageable.

That’s no longer the case. Today, ransomware is something far more dangerous: a coordinated, industrialized threat to business continuity itself. Attackers don’t just lock files anymore—they steal data, stall operations, harass executives, and apply pressure from all angles. One breach can cost millions, cripple supply chains, and draw scrutiny from regulators and customers alike.

Let’s look at how we got here—and what you can do to keep your business safe.

Then vs. now: How ransomware evolved

n the mid-2010s, most ransomware attacks followed a familiar pattern. A phishing email slipped past filters. A user clicked a malicious link or opened a poisoned attachment. Files were encrypted, a ransom note appeared, and IT scrambled to contain the damage.

The attacks were disruptive, yes. But they were largely indiscriminate. The targets were whoever happened to get infected. Most ransoms were in the low five figures, and even then, many organizations could recover without paying.

That era is over.

Attackers now behave more like intelligence teams than petty criminals. They study their targets, identify pressure points, and time their attacks for maximum impact, like during billing cycles, product launches, or peak service periods. They don’t just lock systems; they exfiltrate sensitive data and use it to extort payment, threaten reputational damage, or trigger regulatory action.

In short, ransomware has gone from a numbers game to a precision strike. And that change has made the consequences far more severe.

The modern threat landscape

If there was ever any doubt about ransomware’s power to disrupt critical operations, the past two years have put it to rest.

In early 2024, UnitedHealth Group’s Change Healthcare subsidiary was hit by ALPHV/BlackCat in one of the most devastating healthcare cyberattacks to date. The attackers gained access through compromised Citrix credentials—without multi-factor authentication (MFA)—and quietly exfiltrated data for days before launching the encryption phase.��

The fallout was immediate and sweeping: The U.S. healthcare payment infrastructure ground to a halt, forcing providers to revert to paper claims and disrupting care for millions of patients. UnitedHealth’s losses? Somewhere in the neighborhood of $3 billion.

Just months later, CDK Global, a software provider for over 15,000 car dealerships across North America, was paralyzed by a ransomware attack that left dealers scrambling for weeks. Inventory, financing, service scheduling, and sales operations were all impacted, and manual workarounds couldn’t keep pace. The resulting operational freeze is estimated to have cost the auto retail sector more than $1 billion.

The year before, MGM Resorts found itself in the headlines after a ransomware group used social engineering to bypass identity verification systems and gain access to critical infrastructure. Slot machines, hotel key cards, reservations systems—all down. MGM chose not to pay the ransom, but the attack still racked up over $100 million in losses, alongside legal and regulatory consequences that continue to unfold.

These aren’t isolated incidents. They’re part of a broader trend: Ransomware attacks are targeting high-value organizations in highly regulated, deeply interconnected sectors. They exploit complexity. They weaponize urgency. And they reveal how fragile even the most mature digital operations can be under pressure.

Ransomware has evolved from a breach response problem into a business risk event—one with strategic, reputational, and financial implications that extend far beyond IT.

Triple extortion: The new ransomware playbook

A decade ago, ransomware meant encryption. Attackers would lock the files, demand a payment, and maybe help the victim decrypt once the money came through. The impact was measured in downtime and lost data—not lawsuits, regulatory investigations, or national news.

That playbook has changed.

Modern ransomware operations now rely on a layered strategy designed to escalate pressure and drive payment. First, attackers quietly steal sensitive data before encrypting anything. That gives them a second form of leverage: extortion. If the ransom isn’t paid, they threaten (or actively start) to leak the stolen information. That could mean trade secrets, customer data, HR files, or emails. Whatever hurts.

If that’s not enough, no bother—the attackers will just escalate further. Distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks take systems offline. Harassment campaigns target executives, board members, and even customers. And as public attention grows, so does the risk of legal exposure and regulatory fines.

This is triple extortion in action: encryption, data theft, and aggressive pressure on multiple fronts. It’s a psychological and operational siege designed to force payment not just because systems are down but because reputation, revenue, and regulatory standing are all on the line.

For many victims, the question isn’t “Can we afford to pay?” It’s “Can we afford not to?”

Inside the ransomware economy

Today’s ransomware attacks aren’t the work of lone actors—they’re the product of a professionalized cybercrime ecosystem. Initial access brokers sell entry into corporate networks. Ransomware-as-a-Service (Raas) platforms license out encryption kits and payment portals. And laundering services like crypto mixers help move the money. Each player specializes. And each takes a cut.

Why compliance is no longer enough

It’s a paradox that keeps playing out: The most heavily regulated industries—healthcare, finance, critical infrastructure—suffer some of the most damaging ransomware attacks. These sectors invest heavily in security, maintain extensive audit trails, and enforce strict compliance requirements. So why do they remain so vulnerable?

Because compliance isn’t the same as security. And it definitely isn’t the same as resilience.

Regulations tend to drive uniformity. That’s useful for oversight, but dangerous when attackers are looking for scalable, repeatable vulnerabilities. Compliance frameworks create common baselines, which in turn create predictable environments. For ransomware operators, that predictability is gold, allowing them to design turnkey attack paths that work across entire industries.

Compliance often drives organizations to focus on audit readiness rather than operational security. Legacy systems stay online because they still “meet requirements.” Controls are implemented narrowly to satisfy specific standards, not necessarily to withstand real-world attacks. Investments are prioritized to close findings, not reduce the most urgent risks.

The Change Healthcare attack is a clear example. Despite operating under strict HIPAA mandates, attackers exploited an MFA gap and went undetected for days. The organization was compliant. But it wasn’t protected.

This isn’t a case against regulation—far from it. What it is��is a case for recognizing that real security—especially in the age of ransomware—requires going well beyond what’s required on paper. Because sometimes, checking a box just isn’t enough.

How AI and quantum are changing the game

Ransomware is no longer just evolving in volume—it’s evolving in intelligence. As attackers adopt emerging technologies, the risks are becoming harder to predict and more difficult to contain.

Smarter attacks with AI

AI is transforming the ransomware lifecycle. Large language models (LLMs) are already being used to generate highly convincing phishing messages tailored to specific roles, industries, or internal communications styles, making it far more likely that an unsuspecting user will take the bait.

Attackers are also leveraging automation to identify vulnerabilities, scan misconfigured systems, and map out network paths at record speeds. In some cases, AI is helping ransomware adapt in real time, deciding which systems to encrypt, when to escalate pressure, and how to bypass common defenses.

Quantum and the clock on cryptography

While it’s not at full scale yet, quantum computing poses an existential threat to today’s cryptographic infrastructure. Public-key encryption, which secures everything from TLS/SSL certificates to software updates, will eventually be breakable by quantum methods. And that’s not a hypothetical—it’s just a question of timing.

Forward-looking attackers know this. Some are already harvesting encrypted data with the assumption that it can be cracked later—a strategy known as “harvest now, decrypt later.” If organizations aren’t thinking about quantum readiness today, they may find that tomorrow’s breakthrough arrives too late to respond.

The main takeaway? Ransomware isn’t just getting more aggressive. It’s getting smarter and more technologically advanced. And that demands a shift in how we think about defense—not as a static perimeter, but as a system that must adapt as fast as the threat.

From prevention to resilience

For years, cybersecurity strategy has centered on prevention: Stop the breach, block the payload, shut down the threat before it starts. But ransomware has exposed the limits of that mindset. Even the best-defended organizations can—and do—get breached. What matters just as much now is what happens next.

Resilience is what allows an organization to take a hit and keep operating. It’s the ability to adapt, recover, and maintain continuity even in the middle of an active incident. And it requires more than just technology—it takes planning, visibility, and infrastructure built for agility.

That means knowing not just where your assets are, but how your systems are connected. It means having clear fallback procedures for business-critical functions. It means building unpredictability into your security controls so attackers can’t rely on repeatable tactics. And it means being able to update cryptographic protocols quickly—especially in response to emerging threats like quantum decryption.

Prevention still matters. But the organizations that recover fastest—and suffer least—are the ones that assume some level of breach is inevitable and build systems that can absorb that impact without breaking.

Digital trust: The backbone of ransomware resilience

One of the most overlooked foundations of ransomware defense is digital trust. More and more, modern ransomware targets the systems that underpin secure operations: certificates, code signing, software updates. If attackers can compromise those, they don’t just disrupt your business—they undermine trust in your brand, your software, and your communications.

That’s why PKI modernization is so critical. Outdated certificate management and rigid cryptographic systems can leave organizations exposed. Manual processes increase the risk of outages. Inflexible encryption makes it harder to pivot to post-quantum algorithms.

Solutions like ����TV® ONE provide the visibility, automation, and crypto-agility needed to stay ahead of these threats. Whether it’s managing certificates across complex environments or securing the software supply chain, digital trust is no longer a back-office function.

It’s frontline defense.

Build resilience before you need it with ����TV

����TV ONE delivers the certificate management, software integrity, and crypto-agility you need to stay secure—now and into the post-quantum future.

Reach out today to learn how ����TV ONE can support your ransomware defense strategy.